By Anietie anii-bassey

One more member of the Iranian women’s national soccer team who had initially accepted a humanitarian visa to remain in Australia has now left the country, further reducing the number of players who had sought refuge following their team’s participation in a major regional tournament.

Officials from the Australian government confirmed Monday that the player departed the country shortly before midnight Sunday, marking the latest development in a rapidly shifting situation that has drawn attention from governments, diaspora groups and international media.

The departure means that only two members of the original group that initially chose to stay behind in Australia remain in the country, according to the office of Tony Burke, Australia’s minister responsible for home affairs.

The Iranian women’s national team had traveled to Australia last month to compete in the AFC Women’s Asian Cup, arriving before the outbreak of a major regional conflict that began on Feb. 28. The tournament brought the squad of 26 players and staff members to Sydney as part of the continental competition organized by Asian Football Confederation.

In the early days following the team’s arrival, the players’ participation attracted attention after several members declined to sing the national anthem of Iran before their opening match—an action widely interpreted by observers as a silent protest against the Iranian government. The gesture heightened concerns about how the athletes might be treated if they returned home.

As the political and military crisis in the Middle East intensified, six players along with a member of the team’s support staff accepted humanitarian visas offered by Australia, allowing them to remain in the country while the rest of the Iranian delegation departed.

The remainder of the team traveled from Sydney to Kuala Lumpur on March 10 after completing their tournament commitments. Since then, the group has remained there while decisions about their future continued to unfold.

However, the situation soon began to change.

Government officials said that two players and the support staff member who had originally opted to stay in Australia boarded a flight from Sydney to Malaysia on Saturday, reversing their earlier decision. Their departure left three players in Australia at the time.

With Sunday night’s departure of another player, that number has now fallen to two.

Iranian state media framed the return of the players as a patriotic decision. The outlet Tasnim News Agency reported that the athletes who left Australia were returning to what it described as “the warm embrace of their family and homeland.”

The developments have been closely followed by members of the Iranian diaspora in Australia, many of whom had urged the government to provide protection for the players. Some activists expressed concern that the women may have faced pressure from authorities in Tehran or from individuals communicating with them while they were abroad.

Among those speaking publicly about the situation was Kambiz Razmara, who said the athletes had been forced to make extremely difficult choices in a very short period of time.

“They’ve had to make decisions at the spur of the moment with very little information and they’ve had to react to the circumstance,” Razmara said during an interview with Australian Broadcasting Corporation.

Razmara noted that the pressure on the players could have been enormous, given the possible consequences for them and their families back in Iran.

“I’m surprised that they’ve decided to go,” he said, referring to those who left Australia. “But I’m actually not surprised because I appreciate the pressures that they’re experiencing.”

Some Iranian Australians have also alleged that the support staff member who initially accepted asylum may have been in communication with teammates through text messages encouraging them to return. Those critics claim the messages contained narratives aligned with the Iranian government, though no official confirmation of such claims has been made.

The situation has drawn political attention beyond Australia as well.

Members of the Iranian community and human rights advocates had previously called on Donald Trump, the president of the United States, and Australian officials to help protect the players should they choose to remain abroad.

Iranian media, however, portrayed the episode differently. Some reports described the players’ decision to leave Australia as proof that efforts by Western governments to encourage defections had failed.

Meanwhile, the majority of the Iranian squad remains outside Australia, continuing to stay in Kuala Lumpur while their future plans remain uncertain.

For the two players who have chosen to remain in Australia, their next steps have not yet been publicly detailed. Immigration authorities have not disclosed whether they intend to pursue longer-term refugee status or other legal pathways to stay in the country.

The evolving story highlights the difficult position faced by athletes who find themselves caught between international competition, political tensions and personal safety concerns. As the conflict involving Iran continues to reverberate far beyond the battlefield, even sporting events and national teams have become entwined in the wider geopolitical struggle.

Original article