BY COMFORT OGBONNA

The average rate on the widely used U.S. 30-year fixed mortgage dipped below 6% this week for the first time in three and a half years, offering a glimmer of relief to prospective homebuyers. However, economists warn that the decline may prove temporary and, by itself, unlikely to spark a meaningful rebound in housing demand unless more homes come onto the market.

According to mortgage finance giant Freddie Mac, the average 30-year fixed-rate mortgage fell to 5.98%, its lowest level since September 2022. That compares with 6.01% the previous week and 6.76% during the same period a year ago. The symbolic drop below the 6% threshold has drawn attention across the housing industry, though analysts say broader structural issues continue to weigh heavily on affordability.

Housing has become a politically sensitive issue as Donald Trump faces mounting pressure to address cost-of-living concerns ahead of November’s midterm congressional elections. The administration has floated several proposals aimed at making homeownership more attainable, as rising borrowing costs and elevated home prices have sidelined many first-time buyers.

The recent rate decline followed a drop in the benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury yield after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the administration’s sweeping tariffs. In response, Trump imposed a 10% global tariff, later raising it to 15%. Mortgage rates tend to track the 10-year Treasury yield, and the easing in bond yields helped pull borrowing costs slightly lower.

Still, economists caution that the move may not signal the beginning of a sustained downward trend. Jiayi Xu, an economist at Realtor.com, noted that the latest dip appears tied more to market volatility than to fundamental economic improvements. Without consistently supportive data — such as cooling inflation or clearer signals from monetary policymakers — mortgage rates could remain volatile.

A persistent shortage of homes for sale remains a central obstacle. Economists and policymakers alike point to a chronic lack of inventory, especially at the entry-level segment. Many existing homeowners locked in mortgage rates below 5% during the pandemic-era housing boom, creating what is often described as a “rate-lock” effect. These homeowners are reluctant to sell and take on new loans at higher rates, limiting the supply of previously owned homes and keeping overall inventory well below pre-pandemic norms.

Despite these challenges, some market participants believe the psychological significance of a sub-6% mortgage rate could encourage activity. The spring and early summer months typically mark the busiest period for homebuying, and even modest declines in rates can nudge hesitant buyers and sellers to act.

Kara Ng, senior economist at Zillow, said the headline rate alone could prompt sidelined buyers to reconsider entering the market. A rate beginning with a “5” may restore a measure of confidence for households that have been waiting for signs that borrowing costs are easing.

Matt Vernon, head of consumer lending at Bank of America, expects any improvement in activity to unfold gradually. He emphasized that life events — such as marriage, job relocation, or growing families — often drive housing decisions more than rate fluctuations alone. Still, he acknowledged that lower rates could provide the final push some buyers and homeowners have been waiting for. Mortgage application volumes at Bank of America are up nearly 22% compared with a year ago, suggesting some pickup in interest.

On the pricing front, home values continue to climb, albeit at a slower pace. The Federal Housing Finance Agency reported that house prices rose 1.8% in the 12 months through December, following a 2.1% annual increase in November. The agency oversees mortgage finance firms Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, both of which play critical roles in the secondary mortgage market.

Last month, Trump directed the agency to purchase $200 billion in mortgage bonds in an effort to help lower borrowing costs. While such purchases can reduce yields on mortgage-backed securities and exert downward pressure on mortgage rates, many economists remain skeptical that the move will materially improve affordability. They argue that high home prices and limited supply — not just interest rates — are the primary barriers to entry.

Minutes from the Federal Reserve’s January 27–28 policy meeting indicated that the administration’s bond-buying plans had already led to a “notable decline in mortgage-backed securities yields,” according to a briefing by a New York Fed official.

However, policymakers suggested that the impact on refinancing activity would likely be limited because current mortgage rates remain well above the weighted average rate on outstanding mortgages. In other words, most homeowners still have little financial incentive to refinance.

For now, the drop below 6% offers a symbolic milestone in a housing market that has struggled under the weight of higher borrowing costs and tight supply. Whether it marks the beginning of a sustained easing cycle or merely a brief pause in a volatile rate environment will depend on broader economic forces, including inflation trends, bond market stability, and policy decisions in Washington.

Original article