By Gloria Ogbonna
Welcome back to Friday. This is the Breitbart Business Digest’s weekly wrap our end-of-week tour through the headlines, the markets, and the prevailing hysteria, delivered with the subtlety and restraint of a Canadian prime minister nervously bowing to Chinese communists while insisting it’s all about “partnership.”
This week’s great global freak-out began with President Donald Trump allegedly preparing to single-handedly invade Greenland. Or so the commentariat convinced itself. Somewhere between cable news panels and Davos cocktail parties, this fantasy took on a life of its own.
In reality, Trump merely took a detour on his way to reasserting American economic dominance and landed in Davos, Switzerland. Once there, he confirmed what anyone not suffering from an acute case of Trump Derangement Syndrome already knew: there was never going to be an invasion of Greenland.
Not that Greenland would have been much of a prize for the golfing set anyway. The Nuuk Golf Club boasts a modest nine holes and is playable only a few months a year, while the Uummannaq course specializes in something called “ice golf” which sounds like an excellent excuse for drinking heavily and a terrible idea for actually playing the game.
Still, this didn’t stop a parade of allegedly serious people from panicking. Andrew Ross Sorkin, the CNBC/New York Times fixture and perhaps the most influential financial journalist alive, reported breathlessly from Davos that “the big topic was Greenland.”
According to Sorkin, days were spent wringing hands over whether Trump might pursue military action to control the island. When that imaginary threat was “taken off the table,” the conversations suddenly evaporated.
Anyone paying attention and not blinded by narrative addiction understood from the start that Greenland was a bargaining chip, not a battle plan.
Trump’s public interest was an opening bid, no different from his Liberation Day tariffs, which were designed to shock trading partners into serious negotiations. Even the threatened tariffs on European allies were always unlikely to materialize. This was leverage, not lunacy.
And leverage worked.
While details are still emerging, reports suggest the United States may gain limited sovereignty over areas housing American military bases, secure preferential access to Greenland’s rare earth minerals, and establish stronger control over vital North Atlantic shipping lanes.
NATO allies appear ready to increase funding for Arctic defense, and—most importantly the U.S. extracted commitments to block Russian and Chinese encroachment in the region.
Predictably, when Trump announced Wednesday that a framework agreement had been reached, the usual suspects declared victory for the so-called TACO theory “Trump Always Chickens Out.” This acronym, coined by people perpetually shocked that reality fails to match their worst nightmares, misses the point entirely.
A better framework is PALM: Panicans Always Lose Money. Investors who bought into the Greenland invasion narrative dumped assets early in the week and missed the relief rally when the hysteria collapsed.
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick summed it up perfectly in a Bloomberg interview from Davos: “They overreacted, and there’s proof that they overreacted because now there’s a framework that makes sense.”
But Trump didn’t travel to Davos merely to defuse a media-manufactured crisis. He went to deliver a message several of them, actually to America’s European allies. He warned Europe that mass immigration is hollowing out its economies and destabilizing its politics.
He urged NATO members to take responsibility for their own defense instead of freeloading on American taxpayers. He pointed to U.S. deregulation as a blueprint for reviving stagnant economies.
And he cautioned against the self-destructive strategy of relying on Russian energy while simultaneously banning domestic fossil fuel production in the name of climate panic.
It was, in many ways, a Reagan-esque moment. Like Reagan’s theory of “convergence,” Trump’s argument was simple: the best way America can lead is by example by being a modern “shining city on a hill.” Strong growth, sound policy, and national confidence are more persuasive than lectures ever could be.
Trump highlighted early results from his economic agenda: tariff and trade policies spurring factory construction at home, trade deals tilting back in America’s favor, and a sharply reduced monthly trade deficit without the inflation critics had confidently predicted.
He touted the summer’s tax legislation, which delivered broad-based cuts, eliminated taxes on tips, and made 100 percent bonus depreciation permanent to encourage companies to produce in the United States.
On energy, Trump announced the administration is “going heavy into nuclear,” while openly mocking wind power and China’s dominance over windmill manufacturing.
He also outlined populist proposals aimed squarely at working Americans: limiting institutional investors’ ability to buy single-family homes (“homes are built for people, not corporations”), capping credit-card interest rates at 10 percent for a year, and slashing drug prices by up to 90 percent through “most favored nation” pricing. Gasoline prices, he noted, have already dropped to $1.99 or below in many states.
Perhaps most overlooked—but most important—was Trump’s emphasis on investment over cheap labor. Last year’s tax law restored full expensing, allowing businesses to immediately deduct capital investments.
This corrected a long-standing distortion in the tax code that favored hiring over innovation. Under old rules, wages were fully deductible immediately, while equipment and technology were written off over decades. The result? Less productivity, more lobbying for mass immigration, and an economy tilted toward labor quantity over capital quality.
Full expensing changes that. It encourages automation, technology, and productivity growth—exactly what a tight labor market with 4.4 percent unemployment requires. Growth without inflation depends on output per worker, not endless workforce expansion. For once, the tax code is aligned with economic reality.
And all of this brings us, fittingly, to gold.
On January 24, 1848, James W. Marshall discovered flakes of gold in the American River, igniting the California Gold Rush and reshaping the American West almost overnight.
San Francisco exploded from obscurity into a global hub, powered by the timeless human belief that opportunity lies waiting to be claimed.
That same belief tempered by strategy, leverage, and realism was on display this week. The panic merchants saw catastrophe. Trump saw negotiation. Investors who panicked lost money. Those who understood the game didn’t.
There was gold in them hills then. And for those paying attention, there still is now.
Source Breitbart
Original article
Comments