BY ROSEMARY
Sen. Thom Tillis is using his final year in office to speak with a bluntness rarely heard from members of his own party, openly challenging President Donald Trump’s advisers and criticizing administration decisions he says risk harming U.S. interests at home and abroad.
“I’m sick of stupid,” the two-term Republican from North Carolina declared recently on the Senate floor, directing his frustration at White House aides he accused of inflaming talk of a potential U.S. military takeover of Greenland. The remark was striking not only for its tone but for its timing, coming as Trump continues to threaten tariffs and other coercive measures against European allies over the Arctic island.
Tillis, who has announced he will not seek reelection, has emerged in the opening weeks of 2026 as one of the most outspoken Republican critics of the administration from within its own ranks. Unburdened by the political risks that constrain many GOP lawmakers wary of provoking Trump or his base, Tillis has repeatedly challenged the president’s advisers, policies and rhetoric — even as he continues to express personal support for Trump himself.
He is one of only two Senate Republicans, along with Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski, to join a congressional delegation to Denmark this week amid Trump’s escalating dispute with European governments over Greenland. While there, Tillis sharply criticized the administration’s approach and condemned new tariffs announced Saturday against eight European countries that oppose U.S. control of the territory.
At home, Tillis has also broken with the White House on a range of issues. He publicly questioned the Justice Department’s investigation into Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, voiced concern as Trump allies sought to recast the events of Jan. 6, 2021, and supported the long-delayed installation of a plaque honoring law enforcement officers who defended the Capitol during the attack.
Much of Tillis’ ire has been aimed not directly at Trump, but at senior aides, particularly deputy White House chief of staff Stephen Miller. Tillis bristled after Miller gave a forceful television interview asserting that Greenland “should be part of the United States.”
“I don’t want some staffer telling me what my position is on something,” Tillis said afterward. He added that Miller’s comments were “out of his depth,” reflecting what he sees as a broader problem of advisers pushing extreme or poorly thought-out ideas.
The tone marks a notable shift for Tillis, 65, who has won statewide elections in politically competitive North Carolina and is hardly known as a habitual rebel. While he often praises Trump and says he wants the president to succeed, Tillis has increasingly framed his criticism as an effort to improve decision-making at the highest levels of government.
“I really want this president to be very, very successful,” Tillis said this week. “And a part of his legacy is going to be based on picking and choosing the right advice from people in his administration.”
With midterm elections approaching, Tillis said he believes reckless policies could damage Republican prospects nationwide. “I want to create a better environment for Republicans to win,” he said.
Tillis’ background helps explain his approach. After a difficult childhood marked by frequent moves, he spent roughly 25 years in the private sector, working at an accounting and consulting firm before entering politics. He later served as speaker of the North Carolina House from 2011 to 2015. He says that experience shaped his habit of pushing back when he believes an idea is impractical or harmful.
“Sometimes there’s just things that people need to say: ‘Not a good idea, not in our best interest, hard to implement,’” Tillis said. “That’s what I did in the private sector.”
Beyond foreign policy, Tillis has also questioned the administration’s handling of domestic law enforcement controversies. He expressed concern over Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem’s immediate public defense of an ICE officer who fatally shot Renee Good, a U.S. citizen, during a confrontation in Minneapolis. Noem said within hours of the shooting that Good had attempted to run over an officer, even as an investigation was still underway.
Speaking the following day, Tillis said he was “surprised by the level of certainty” in Noem’s remarks and suggested such statements may have shaped Trump’s own quick defense of the officer.
“She’s advising the president,” Tillis said. “So the president’s comments had to have come, I assume, through the advice of the secretary.”
In a social media post criticizing Trump’s new tariffs on European allies, Tillis again pointed the finger at the president’s inner circle rather than Trump himself.
“The fact that a small handful of ‘advisors’ are actively pushing for coercive action to seize territory of an ally is beyond stupid,” he wrote.
Tillis’ careful but pointed balancing act was on full display earlier this month during events marking the fifth anniversary of the Jan. 6 attack. He helped broker an agreement to publicly display the plaque honoring officers who defended the Capitol, which had been delayed amid internal disputes. On the Senate floor, Tillis called Jan. 6 “one of the worst days in my 11 years in the U.S. Senate” and praised Capitol Police and staff for safeguarding lawmakers and ensuring certification of the 2020 election.
At the same time, he struck sharply partisan notes, criticizing Democrats for supporting efforts to defund police and faulting media coverage of violent protests during the summer of 2020. He described Jan. 6 as a “stress test for democracy,” then argued the Biden administration went too far by prosecuting people who entered the Capitol but were not leaders of the attack.
He also condemned Trump’s sweeping pardons of Jan. 6 defendants, including individuals who assaulted police officers — again directing his criticism toward unnamed White House advisers rather than Trump personally.
“The president, on the advice of somebody in the White House — and I hope I find out the name of that person — also pardoned criminals who injured police officers and destroyed this building,” Tillis said. “Would you just let them go, or would you hold them accountable for destroying the citadel of democracy?”
The White House declined to comment on Tillis’ criticism of Trump’s advisers. Tillis has dismissed suggestions that his newfound candor is tied to his impending retirement, calling that idea “hysterical.”
His relationship with Trump has been strained before. Last summer, Tillis voted against the president’s sweeping tax and spending package, prompting Trump to accuse him of grandstanding and label him a “talker and complainer.” Tillis announced his retirement shortly afterward, one of only two Senate Republicans to oppose the bill.
More recently, Trump has taken a more measured tone. Asked this week about Tillis’ criticism of the Federal Reserve probe, the president said, “That’s why Thom’s not going to be a senator any longer, I guess.”
Still, Trump added, “Look, I like Thom Tillis. But he’s not going to be a senator any longer because of views like that.”
For Tillis, the remarks appear to underscore the freedom he now feels — and the risks he believes Republicans face if dissenting voices remain silent.
Original article
Comments