France and Germany are working with regional partners on a joint response as the Trump administration signals Greenland acquisition remains a U.S. national security priority.
By yourNEWS Media Newsroom
France and Germany are coordinating with other European partners to develop a unified response to renewed U.S. interest in acquiring Greenland, according to officials in Paris and Berlin, as the Trump administration reiterates that control of the Arctic territory is a strategic objective.
The diplomatic activity follows heightened international attention on Greenland after Washington’s recent military action in Venezuela, which the White House has framed as an assertion of the Monroe Doctrine and U.S. primacy in the Western Hemisphere. The renewed focus has raised questions about Greenland’s status, given that the island lies in North America but remains a self-governing territory under the Kingdom of Denmark.
Although Greenland is not a member of the European Union and formally withdrew from the European Community in 1985, European governments have reacted sharply to statements from U.S. officials suggesting that force could be used to secure the island. EU capitals have expressed opposition to any attempt by the United States to alter Greenland’s status without European consultation.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday that President Donald Trump views Greenland as a national security priority and that the administration is evaluating multiple paths to achieve that objective, including military options, according to remarks reported by CBS News.
According to Breitbart News, French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot said Paris is working with Berlin and Warsaw to craft a coordinated European position, telling reporters in comments carried by Reuters that France wants to act “together with our European partners.” A German government source separately said Berlin is closely coordinating with Denmark and other European governments on next steps regarding Greenland.
Senior Trump administration officials have sought to temper speculation about imminent military action. Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy Stephen Miller has downplayed the likelihood that force would ultimately be required. The Wall Street Journal reported that Secretary of State Marco Rubio told lawmakers in a closed briefing that public references to military options were intended to pressure Denmark into negotiations over a potential sale.
According to the Associated Press, officials in Copenhagen and Nuuk are seeking a meeting with Rubio to clarify Washington’s position. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen has warned that a U.S. military takeover of Greenland would effectively end NATO, a statement she made despite the disparity between U.S. defense spending and that of other alliance members, as reported by Breitbart.
U.S. interest in Greenland is not new. The idea dates back to the 19th century, when Secretary of State William H. Seward floated the possibility of acquiring Greenland and Iceland after negotiating the purchase of Alaska. Subsequent efforts, including proposals following World War II, failed. A successful acquisition under Trump would represent the largest expansion of U.S. territory since the Louisiana Purchase.
Alternative arrangements short of outright acquisition have also been discussed. One option is a Compact of Free Association similar to agreements the United States maintains with the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau. Under such a framework, Greenland would retain sovereignty while granting the U.S. military broad access, in exchange for economic assistance, free trade, and expanded mobility rights.
Any such arrangement would likely require a referendum among Greenland’s roughly 57,000 residents on independence from Denmark, a vote permitted under the island’s 2009 Self-Government Act. Final approval would rest with the Danish parliament, potentially allowing Copenhagen to seek compensation as part of any agreement.
A European Union diplomat told POLITICO that Washington may attempt to leverage future security guarantees in Ukraine to soften European resistance to U.S. control over Greenland. U.S. officials have also cited concerns that an independent Greenland could fall under the influence of China or Russia, both of which have growing strategic interests in the Arctic.
The Trump administration has additionally pointed to Greenland’s rare-earth mineral deposits as a strategic consideration, given China’s dominant position in global mineral supply chains. To address concerns among Greenlanders, former National Security Council official Alexander Gray has suggested establishing a sovereign wealth fund modeled on Alaska’s, allowing residents to directly benefit from resource development.
As European governments organize their response, the future of Greenland remains a focal point in broader debates over Arctic security, transatlantic relations, and the balance of power in the Western Hemisphere.
Original article
Comments