The Trump administration’s overhauling of the decades-old childhood vaccination schedule, , has raised alarm among public health experts and pediatricians.
The U.S. , the grid of colored bars pediatricians share with parents, recommends a set of vaccines given from birth through adolescence to prevent a range of serious infections. The basic structure has been in place since 1995, when federal health officials and medical organizations , though new vaccines have been added regularly as science advanced.
That schedule is now being dismantled.
In all, the sweeping change . It moves vaccines against rotavirus, influenza, hepatitis A, hepatitis B and meningococcal disease from routine recommendations to “shared clinical decision-making,” a category that shifts responsibility for initiating vaccination from the health care system to individual families.
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has , comparing .
But the two countries differ in important ways. Denmark has 6 million people, universal health care and a national registry . In contrast, the U.S. has 330 million people, 27 million uninsured and a system where millions move between providers.
These changes follow the CDC’s that all newborns be vaccinated against hepatitis B, despite no new evidence that questions the vaccine’s long-standing safety record.
I’m an who treats vaccine-preventable diseases and behind immunization recommendations. The vaccine schedule wasn’t designed in a single stroke. It was , shaped by disease outbreaks, technological breakthroughs and hard-won lessons about reducing childhood illness and death.
The early years
For the first half of the 20th century, most states required that students be to enter the public school system. But there was no unified national schedule. The combination vaccine against , known as the DTP vaccine, emerged in 1948, and the , but recommendations for when and how to give them varied by state, by physician and even by neighborhood.
The federal government stepped in after tragedy struck. In 1955, a in Berkeley, California, produced batches of polio vaccine containing live virus, causing paralysis in dozens of children. The incident made clear that vaccination couldn’t remain a patchwork affair. It required federal oversight.
In 1964, the U.S. surgeon general , to provide expert guidance and recommendations to the CDC on vaccine use. For the first time, a single body would evaluate the evidence and issue national recommendations.
New viral vaccines
Through the 1960s, vaccines against measles (1963), mumps (1967) and rubella (1969) were licensed and eventually . Each addition followed a similar pattern: a disease that killed or disabled thousands of children annually, a vaccine that proved safe and effective in trials, and a recommendation that transformed a seemingly inevitable childhood illness into something preventable.
The rubella vaccine went beyond protecting the children who received it. Rubella, also called German measles, is mild in children but , causing deafness, heart defects and intellectual disabilities when pregnant women are infected.
drove this point home: 12.5 million infections and 20,000 cases of congenital rubella syndrome left thousands of children deaf or blind. Vaccinating children also helped protect pregnant women by curbing the spread of infection. By 2015, from the Americas.
Hepatitis B and the safety net
In 1991, the CDC added to the schedule. Before then, around .
Many parents wonder why newborns need this vaccine. The answer lies in biology and the limitations of screening.
An adult who contracts hepatitis B has a 95% chance of clearing the virus. An infant infected in the first months of life has a , and from liver failure or cancer. from their mothers during birth, from infected household members or through casual contact in child care settings. The virus survives on surfaces for days and is highly contagious.
Early strategies that targeted only high-risk groups failed because screening missed too many infected mothers. Even today, roughly 12% to 18% of pregnant women in the U.S. are never screened for hepatitis B. Until ACIP , a first dose of this vaccine at birth served as a safety net, protecting all infants regardless of whether their mothers’ infection status was accurately known.
This safety net worked: .
A unified standard
For decades, different medical organizations issued their own, sometimes conflicting, recommendations. In 1995, ACIP, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family Physicians jointly released the , the ancestor of today’s familiar grid. For the first time, parents and physicians had a single national standard.
The schedule continued to evolve. ACIP recommended vaccinations for in 1996; , replacing an after safety monitoring detected a rare side effect; and .
Each addition : evidence review, risk-benefit analysis and a public vote by the advisory committee.
More vaccines, less burden
Vaccine skeptics, including Kennedy, often claim erroneously that because the number of vaccines they receive has increased. This argument is routinely marshaled to argue for a reduced childhood vaccination schedule.
One fact often surprises parents: Despite the increase in recommended vaccines, the number of immune-stimulating molecules in those vaccines, called antigens, has dropped dramatically since the 1980s, which means they are less demanding on a child’s immune system.
The whole-cell pertussis vaccine used in the 1980s alone . Today’s entire schedule , thanks to advances in vaccine technology that allow precise targeting of only the components needed for protection.
What lies ahead
For decades, ACIP recommended changes to the childhood schedule only when new evidence or clear shifts in disease risk demanded it. The Jan. 5 announcement represents a fundamental break from that norm: Multiple vaccines moved out of routine recommendations simultaneously, justified not by new safety data but by comparison to a country with a fundamentally different health care system.
Kennedy accomplished this by filling positions involved in vaccine safety with political appointees. His is stacked with members with a . The authors of the , senior officials at the and , are both long-time critics of the existing vaccine schedule. The acting CDC director who signed the decision memo is an .
The practical effect will be felt in clinics across the country. Routine recommendations trigger automatic prompts in medical records and enable nurses to vaccinate under standing orders. “Shared clinical decision-making” requires a physician to be involved in every vaccination decision, creating bottlenecks that will inevitably reduce uptake, particularly for the more than 100 million Americans who lack regular access to primary care.
, including the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, have said that they will continue recommending the full complement of childhood vaccines. Several states, including California, New York and Illinois, rather than the new federal recommendations, creating a patchwork where children’s protection depends on where they live.
Portions of this article originally appeared in a previous article published on .
Original article
Comments