Newly declassified emails reveal FBI agents warned prosecutors the 2022 search lacked legal justification—but were overruled by Biden administration officials.
By yourNEWS Media Newsroom
FBI Director Kash Patel confirmed Tuesday that the Biden Justice Department proceeded with the 2022 raid on Mar-a-Lago despite internal FBI warnings that probable cause for the search warrant had not been established.
The revelation comes after Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) released declassified emails showing FBI agents repeatedly cautioned that the evidentiary basis for the warrant was weak, uncorroborated, or outdated—only to be overruled by DOJ prosecutors.
“It’s true—we just turned over documents to Capitol Hill showing the FBI told DOJ they did not have probable cause for raiding President Trump’s home, but DOJ ‘didn’t give a damn’ and did it anyway,” Patel wrote on X.
FBI Agents Raised Red Flags
The emails, exchanged between June and August 2022, reveal FBI officials expressing serious doubts about the legal justification for the raid:
- One assistant special agent in charge wrote that “very little has been developed related to who might be culpable for mishandling the documents,” calling the evidence “single source,” “not corroborated,” and “potentially dated.”
- Another agent complained that investigators were being pressured to revise affidavit drafts repeatedly without new factual developments, asking: “Absent a witness coming forward with recent information, at what point is it fair to table this?”
- A Washington Field Office (WFO) official explicitly stated: “We do not believe that we have established probable cause for the search warrant for classified records at Mar-a-Lago.”
DOJ Pushed Ahead Despite Warnings
Despite these internal objections, DOJ officials insisted the probable cause threshold was met and moved forward with the raid on August 8, 2022, seizing thousands of documents from Trump’s residence.
FBI agents had recommended a less confrontational approach, suggesting notifying Trump’s attorneys and seeking voluntary compliance—an option Trump’s legal team had already offered. One official wrote:
“Even as we continue down the path toward a search warrant, WFO believes that a reasonable conversation with the former president’s attorney … ought not to be discounted.”
Legal Fallout and Dismissal
The raid led to 40 federal charges against Trump for alleged mishandling of classified documents, but in July 2024, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the indictment, ruling that special counsel Jack Smith’s appointment was improper. After Trump’s re-election, the Biden DOJ dropped its appeal, citing the longstanding policy against prosecuting sitting presidents.
A Pattern of Overreach?
The declassified emails suggest the Biden DOJ ignored FBI concerns and pursued a politically charged raid despite weak legal grounds. Critics argue this reflects a broader pattern of weaponizing law enforcement against political opponents—a claim the Trump administration has vowed to investigate further.
“The American people deserve answers about why the DOJ disregarded its own agents’ warnings and moved forward with such an aggressive, unprecedented action,” a White House spokesperson said Tuesday. “This was not about justice—it was about politics.”
Original article
Comments