Nasa's big mistake on Dream Chaser Space Plane...SpaceX's Dragon is X1000 better!

"Nasa's big mistake on Dream Chaser Space Plane...SpaceX's Dragon is X1000 better!
===
Intro 0:00
NASA’s failed redundancy strategy 1:08
One supplier vs. many suppliers 4:49
A good choice 8:11
===
#techmap #techmaps #elonmusk #starshipspacex #spacex
===
Nasa's big mistake on Dream Chaser Space Plane...SpaceX's Dragon is X1000 better!
NASA had a clear strategy—don't rely on just one ride to space. That’s why they brought both Boeing’s Star liner and SpaceX’s Crew Dragon into the Commercial Crew Program. A smart move... in theory.
But here’s the problem—NASA handed Boeing the bigger slice of the pie... and got crumbs in return. Billions spent. Zero successful crewed missions. And a long list of delays and technical issues.
Then came Dream Chaser. Sierra Space’s sleek, winged spaceplane promised a bold new path—a reusable, runway-landing vehicle that had fans and experts buzzing. Could this be the replacement NASA needed?
Fast-forward a few years… and Dream Chaser is still sitting on the ground. Launch dates pushed. Promises delayed. Sound familiar?
It begs the question—is Dream Chaser just another costly NASA misstep? And more importantly—should NASA stop spreading its bets across unreliable providers… and just double down on what works?
Find out everything in today's Techmap episode!
Nasa's big mistake on Dream Chaser Space Plane...SpaceX's Dragon is X1000 better!
NASA is facing criticism for its seemingly excessive spending. While the agency has implemented President Obama’s initiative to foster the commercial space industry to cut costs for space access, the outcomes haven’t entirely aligned with expectations. NASA's strategy of maintaining redundancy for transporting crew and cargo to the ISS relies on multiple providers—SpaceX’s Dragon, Boeing’s Star liner, and Sierra Space’s Dream Chaser. Yet so far, only SpaceX’s Dragon has proven consistently reliable for both crewed and cargo missions.
Boeing’s Star liner has suffered numerous technical issues, including propulsion system failures and software problems, which have delayed Nasa's certification for this vehicle. Meanwhile, Dream Chaser, aimed at expanding cargo capabilities, has also faced ongoing delays and isn’t ready to support NASA’s needs.
Nasa's big mistake on Dream Chaser Space Plane...SpaceX's Dragon is X1000 better!
As a result, NASA finds itself heavily reliant on SpaceX for space access. Even Northrop Grumman’s Cygnus spacecraft, another cargo option, lacks the reusability of Dragon, making it a less versatile solution. In practice, NASA's redundancy plan seems more theoretical than functional.
This situation might not raise eyebrows if it weren’t for the sheer amount of taxpayer money funding these efforts. The figures are startling.
NASA has theoretically invested nearly $5 billion into Boeing’s Star liner program, including a $4.2 billion contract awarded in 2014 and an additional $326 million for extra tasks since then. Thankfully, not all of this money has been disbursed—Boeing must complete a certain number of missions according to the contract to receive the full $4.2 billion. Still, despite this massive financial commitment, Boeing has yet to deliver a single completed mission for NASA.
===
Subcribe TechMap: http://tinyurl.com/3z5ysrtf"