NASA's New Space Plane Landing method Somehow Solves what SpaceX's Dragon Impossible...

NASA's New Space Plane Landing method Somehow Solves what SpaceX's Dragon Impossible...
===
#alphatech
#techalpha
#spacex
#elonmusk
#starship
===
NASA's New Space Plane Landing method Somehow Solves what SpaceX's Dragon Impossible...
If you were an astronaut standing before an operational spacecraft like Dragon, Soyuz, or Starliner, you would undoubtedly choose SpaceX's Dragon.
However, if there were a spaceplane in that lineup, would you still be certain about your initial choice? I believe many people would hesitate because, in reality, everyone would prefer the experience of landing smoothly like an airplane rather than splashing down in the ocean.
And this is exactly what spaceplanes can do that conventional spacecraft cannot. NASA's newest spaceplane, Dream Chaser, which is about to debut, will offer capabilities that even SpaceX's Dragon cannot match.
Let's find out in today's episode of Alpha Tech!
NASA's New Space Plane Landing method Somehow Solves what SpaceX's Dragon Impossible...
NASA’s origins in aeronautics profoundly shaped its approach to spacecraft design, especially in its early years. Most of NASA’s pioneering engineers were trained in aerodynamics and carried an aviation mindset into space exploration. To them, spacecraft were not entirely new inventions but rather natural extensions of aircraft. This perspective led to a strong preference for winged vehicles capable of gliding through Earth’s atmosphere and landing precisely on runways rather than relying on ocean splashdowns like those used in the Mercury and Apollo programs. This philosophy laid the foundation for the Space Shuttle, a revolutionary step in space exploration that completed 135 missions between 1981 and 2011 and stood out for its ability to perform controlled horizontal landings similar to jet aircraft.
NASA's New Space Plane Landing method Somehow Solves what SpaceX's Dragon Impossible...
The Shuttle’s winged design offered significant advantages in maneuverability during atmospheric re-entry. With a wingspan of 23.8 meters and an aerodynamic shape, it could alter its trajectory by as much as 2,200 kilometers off its original path. This allowed landings at various locations, such as Vandenberg Air Force Base or Kennedy Space Center. The U.S. Air Force especially valued this capability, as it required a vehicle that could quickly return to Earth at strategic locations on short notice for military or emergency scenarios. Compared to capsule-based spacecraft relying on parachutes, the Shuttle’s runway landings appeared more advanced and promised reusability. Its initial goal was to reduce launch costs to around \$10–20 million per mission, significantly lower than the hundreds of millions required for expendable rockets.
===
Subcribe Alpha Tech: https://www.youtube.com/@alphatech4966/?sub_confirmation=1
===