<div class="gjw_content"><div><div class="Article-paragraph"><p><strong>WASHINGTON (NEWSnet/AP) —</strong> The Supreme Court on Thursday preserved a Republican-held South Carolina congressional district, rejecting a lower-court ruling that said the district discriminated against Black voters.</p></div></div> <div><div class="Article-paragraph"> </div></div> <div><div class="Article-paragraph"><p>The court’s conservative majority said in a 6-3 decision that the Republican-controlled state legislature did nothing wrong during redistricting when it strengthened Rep. Nancy Mace’s hold on the coastal district by moving 30,000 Democratic-leaning Black residents of Charleston out of the district.</p></div></div> <div><div class="Article-paragraph"> </div></div> <div><div class="Article-paragraph"><p>In dissent, the liberal justices said the ruling would “impede racial gerrymandering cases generally.”</p></div></div> <div><div class="Article-paragraph"> </div></div> <div><div class="Article-paragraph"><p>The state argued that partisan politics, not race, and a population boom in coastal areas explain the congressional map. Moving voters based on their politics is OK, the Supreme Court has held.</p></div></div> <div><div class="Article-paragraph"> </div></div> <div><div class="Article-paragraph"><p>A lower court had ordered South Carolina to redraw the district after it found that the state used race as a proxy for partisan affiliation in violation of the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. But that court had put its order on hold and had already allowed the state to use the challenged map in the 2024 elections.</p></div></div> <div><div class="Article-paragraph"> </div></div> <div><div class="Article-paragraph"><p>Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the court, said that one weakness of the Black voters’ case was that they did not produce an alternative map, which he called an “implicit concession” that they couldn’t have drawn one.</p></div></div> <div><div class="Article-paragraph"> </div></div> <div><div class="Article-paragraph"><p>Justice Elena Kagan, writing for the three liberals, said her conservative colleagues ignored the work of the lower court that found the district had been gerrymandered by race.</p></div></div> <div><div class="Article-paragraph"> </div></div> <div><div class="Article-paragraph"><p>In South Carolina, Black voters wouldn’t have been as numerous in a redrawn district. But combined with a substantial set of Democratic-leaning white voters, Democrats might have been competitive in the reconfigured district.</p></div></div> <div><div class="Article-paragraph"> </div></div> <div><div class="Article-paragraph"><p>The high court left open one part of the case about whether the map intentionally sought to dilute the votes of Black residents.</p></div></div> <div><div class="Article-paragraph"> </div></div> <div><div class="Article-paragraph"><p><strong>Follow NEWSnet on </strong><strong>Facebook</strong><strong> and </strong><strong>X platform</strong><strong> to get our headlines in your social feeds.</strong></p></div></div> <div><div class="Article-paragraph"> </div></div> <div><div class="Article-paragraph"><p><em>Copyright 2024 NEWSnet and The Associated Press. All rights reserved.</em></p></div></div></div>
