By Blessing Nweke

Israel has countered South Africa’s accusations of genocide in the International Court of Justice (ICJ), claiming a “distorted factual and legal picture.” Israeli lawyer Tal Becker argued that South Africa presented a “counter-factual description” of the Israel-Palestinian conflict. South Africa alleges Israel’s genocide in Gaza and seeks an ICJ order to halt Israeli military activities.

Outside the ICJ, police maintain separation between rival groups. Palestinians with flags watch a live feed, drawing parallels with apartheid, while Israelis display a symbolic Sabbath table, highlighting over 130 hostages held by Hamas. South Africa contends Israel violates the 1949 Genocide Convention, accusing it of intentional destruction.

Israel’s defense argues that Hamas maximizes civilian harm, contrasting South Africa’s portrayal as “distorted and manipulative.” In response, South Africa claims Israel has “genocidal intent,” planning Gaza’s destruction at the state’s highest level. The death toll, mainly women and children, stands at over 23,350 according to Gaza’s health ministry.

Prime Minister Netanyahu criticizes South Africa’s “hypocrisy,” pointing to atrocities in Syria and Yemen by “Hamas partners.” UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak supports Israel’s right to defend itself, calling South Africa’s case “completely unjustified and wrong.”

The ICJ’s ruling on the genocide allegation will be an opinion, closely observed despite potential years for a final verdict. Meanwhile, a quicker decision may address South Africa’s plea for Israel to suspend its military campaign.