By Cai Siyun, Vision Times
For two months, the death of Chinese actor Yu Menglong, also known as Alan Yu, on Sept. 11 has remained one of the most hotly debated mysteries in China. Despite Beijing police insisting that the 37-year-old star died from an “alcohol-related fall,” the public has overwhelmingly rejected the explanation, citing glaring contradictions involving security footage, eyewitness behavior, and a timeline that doesn’t match police claims.
Now, a new development has electrified netizens: A group of young women traveled to Beijing to conduct their own on-the-ground investigation — and their findings directly contradict official reports.
Their 40-page investigative document — based on weather data, site inspections, audio analysis, and timeline reconstruction — has gone viral, with many calling it the clearest, most professional, and most objective report on the case to date. The report, titled “Field Notes on Locations Relevant to the Yu Menglong Incident,” is divided into three sections: “Moonlit Chapter,” “Qihai Chapter,” and “Afterword,” with the latter moving thousands of readers to tears.
RELATED: Whistleblower Targeted for Exposing High-Ranking Official in Yu Menglong Case
A grassroots probe
For the best of our weekly content！
You are now signed up for our newsletter
Check your email to complete sign up
According to the X account “News Investigation,” which has closely tracked the case, the women visited multiple key locations linked to Yu’s death:
The group discovered physical alterations to the area, signs of attempts to obscure traces, and multiple inconsistencies between the police narrative and observable evidence. “The facts are not adding up,” the civilian-led probe said.
The report’s “Moonlit Chapter” reconstructs the timeline based on rain patterns, ambient noise, security lighting, and witness behavior. Meanwhile, the “Qihai Chapter” maps out connections among suspects, the art museum, and the hotel, concluding that the area had undergone “deliberate post-incident modifications.”
RELATED: Reports Claim Yu Menglong Was Imprisoned at Qihao Art Museum
Netizens step up
The anonymous investigator’s Afterword has been widely shared for its emotional clarity: “People asked why I care — I’m a stranger to him. I’m not ‘caring.’ I’m responding. Responding to a life in pain, responding to a society’s indifference, responding to my own longing for justice.”
“The screams, the pleas for help, the terror in that leaked audio — I couldn’t sleep for nights. I cried not because I’m weak, but because I cannot accept that someone might have died in extreme suffering only to be dismissed as an accident. If this is allowed, then any one of us could become an ‘accident.’”
RELATED: Yu Menglong Case Deepens: Missing Phone, Corporate Shake-Up, Powerful Cover-Ups
“I lost my work rhythm, my friends’ understanding, even my emotional stability. I can’t eat, can’t sleep, and often cry at night. I’m not obsessed — I’m enduring. People say to just focus on my job, but if I can’t defend even the most basic justice, what does ‘going to work’ even mean? We may be small like ants — but even ants can leave marks. Truth isn’t about strength; it’s about persistence.” The post resonated deeply across Chinese social media.
Official date of death doesn’t match up
One of the report’s most explosive findings is that Yu may not have died on Sept. 11, as police claimed. The timeline they gave was:
Within days, three netizens who posted about the case were arrested. But the investigators’ weather analysis revealed something astonishing: It was raining on the night of the incident — but only one night that week had rain.
According to the official meteorological station for that district:
But videos from the scene show:
Therefore, the report notes: “Yu Menglong most likely died on the night of Sept. 9 — not Sept. 11.” If true, virtually the entire police narrative would collapse.
‘Heaven was furious’
Online reactions were immediate and intense:
Many praised the investigators for their bravery and through investigation:
Online commentator “News Investigation” summarized the public’s mood: “If a celebrity with massive traffic can be murdered and the police pretend not to see it, then ordinary people stand no chance. Not speaking for Yu today means no one will speak for you tomorrow.”
Media commentator Li Dayu echoed this in his program, saying the revelation of the alleged falsified death date “alone is enough to overturn everything the authorities have claimed.”
The investigation has become about more than Yu Menglong — it has become a referendum on public trust, state transparency, and the fear that anyone, no matter how visible, can disappear into a system designed to erase truth rather than uncover it.