Escalation raises uncertainty over ceasefire as regional tensions intensify and global energy routes face renewed disruption.
By yourNEWS Media Newsroom
Iran has reportedly suspended the movement of oil tankers through the Strait of Hormuz following accusations that Israel violated a recently established ceasefire by conducting large-scale strikes in Lebanon, according to regional reporting and statements shared by journalists and officials.
State media announcements cited by correspondent Ariel Oseran indicated that Tehran halted tanker passage after Israeli military actions targeted positions in Lebanon. In a post shared on X, Ariel Oseran wrote that Iranian outlets reported the suspension in response to what they described as repeated Israeli strikes, adding that earlier in the day, limited transit had been permitted under Iranian authorization.
The reported strikes were described in coverage by Reuters as among the most intense of the conflict, focusing on Hezbollah-linked targets in Beirut and surrounding regions.
Separately, PBS correspondent Liz Landers said she spoke with Donald Trump regarding whether Lebanon was included in the ceasefire terms. In a post on X, Liz Landers reported that Trump responded, “Because of Hezbollah… They were not included in the deal. That’ll get taken care of too. It’s alright.”
According to the same account, when asked whether continued Israeli strikes were acceptable under the agreement, Trump said the actions were “part of the deal” before ending the conversation.
Trump also indicated that diplomatic engagement with Iran could resume soon. In remarks reported by the New York Post, he said in-person negotiations would take place “very soon,” while noting that Vice President JD Vance might not attend due to security considerations.
Lebanon’s government publicly condemned the Israeli strikes. In a statement shared on X by the country’s presidency, Lebanon’s official account described the attacks as “barbaric” and said they demonstrated “contempt for all international laws and norms.” The statement warned that continued escalation could increase instability across the region.
Military officials in Israel said the strikes represented a significant escalation in operations against Hezbollah. The Israel Defense Forces reported that more than 100 targets were struck within a 10-minute window, including command centers and weapons infrastructure across Beirut, the Beqaa Valley, and southern Lebanon.
An IDF statement said the operation involved approximately 50 aircraft deploying 160 munitions. Military officials said the targets included missile launch systems, naval assets, and facilities associated with Hezbollah’s aerial capabilities. The IDF added that further strikes could follow, with one official stating the military “will continue striking the Hezbollah terror organization and will utilize every operational opportunity.”
Israeli military spokesperson Lt. Col. Nadav Shoshani said Hezbollah had increasingly dispersed operations into civilian areas, complicating targeting decisions. “We are seeing them move in a more dispersed way and try to embed their operations behind civilians more and more,” he said.
The renewed tensions come just days after a U.S.-brokered ceasefire aimed at reopening the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global shipping route responsible for a significant share of the world’s oil supply.
Iran’s reported decision to halt tanker traffic threatens to disrupt energy markets again. Oil prices had previously fallen following the ceasefire announcement, as noted in reporting by the Daily Caller, which said prices declined toward $95 per barrel amid expectations of resumed shipments.
The ceasefire agreement itself followed weeks of military escalation. U.S. operations targeting Iranian infrastructure included strikes such as one reported by the Daily Caller on Kharg Island ahead of a deadline set by Trump for reopening the waterway.
In parallel, the administration warned that countries supplying weapons to Iran during the ceasefire could face economic consequences. As reported by the Daily Caller, Trump threatened tariffs targeting such suppliers.
Statements from both sides have framed the outcome of the conflict differently. U.S. officials have described the campaign as achieving its military objectives, while Iranian authorities have characterized the ceasefire as a victory and said their conditions were accepted.
Iran’s Supreme National Security Council said in a statement that the country had “achieved a great victory” and compelled the United States to accept its proposal.
Despite the ceasefire framework, the latest developments highlight ongoing instability and uncertainty over whether the agreement can hold, particularly as military operations continue in areas not explicitly covered by its terms.