A former Chinese official once known for his blunt, “down-to-earth” speaking style is again drawing attention, after details emerged online of remarks in which he allegedly mocked policies associated with China’s top leader, Xi Jinping.
Zhou Derui, a former member of the Tianjin municipal Party Standing Committee and head of the Organization Department, had already been dismissed from his posts and expelled from the Chinese Communist Party in 2025. Now, newly circulated accounts accuse him of “improperly discussing central authorities”—a political charge often used in disciplinary cases.
Details of alleged remarks
On March 23, 2026, Cai Xia, a former professor at the Central Party School of the Chinese Communist Party, reposted an article from a WeChat account that claimed to reveal details of Zhou’s case.
The article, titled “Master of Law and Former Tianjin Organization Chief Accused of Improper Remarks on Central Authorities”, cited what it described as disclosures from investigators. It said Zhou had shown “weak political awareness” and had criticized major central policies.
According to the account, Zhou made several remarks in private and semi-public settings:
For the best of our weekly content！
You are now signed up for our newsletter
Check your email to complete sign up
In early 2022, during a small banquet event in Tianjin known as “Haihe Spring,” Zhou allegedly mocked Xi’s “common prosperity” policy, saying: “If everyone becomes wealthy, who will deliver food or work on assembly lines?”
In 2023, at a closing seminar for a Party School training session in Tianjin, Zhou reportedly deviated from prepared remarks and joked about the “housing is for living, not for speculation” policy, rephrasing it as “housing is for not arguing, but the more you argue, the higher prices go,” prompting laughter in the room.
Later that year, in October 2023, at a local gathering in his hometown of Hengyang in Hunan Province, Zhou allegedly questioned China’s decade-long fishing ban on the Yangtze River, calling it “an overreaction,” and added: “Policies are made on a whim at the top, while those below run themselves ragged implementing them.”
The article claimed that a businessman from Zhou’s hometown recorded the remarks, and that the audio eventually reached China’s top anti-corruption body, the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection.
Cai Xia commented that the case reflected an environment in which Party members and officials were expected to strictly follow Xi’s personal authority, leaving little room for independent thought or expression.
Overseas-based commentator Cai Shenkun also weighed in, noting that Zhou had previously gained prominence for a widely quoted statement on political loyalty: “Loyalty that is not absolute is absolutely disloyal.” Cai argued that Zhou’s rise in Hunan and later in Tianjin was tied to the patronage of senior official Li Hongzhong, but that shifting political dynamics in Tianjin later contributed to his downfall.
Online reactions and broader implications
Users on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, reacted to the reports with a mix of satire and criticism. Some questioned whether the cited remarks were merely symbolic examples used in official charges, while others framed the case as evidence of strict ideological control within the political system.
Comments included observations that authoritarian systems discourage independent thinking among officials and reward conformity.
The discussion reflects broader sensitivities within China’s political system, where expressions seen as deviating from official positions can carry significant consequences.
Zhou, born in February 1966 in Qidong County, Hunan Province, built his career through a series of administrative roles. He served in Hunan’s land and resources department before moving into municipal leadership positions in Yongzhou and later Changde.
In 2013, he became mayor of Changde, and in 2017 was promoted to Party secretary of the city. His use of colloquial language and references to popular expressions earned him a reputation as an “internet-famous mayor” and later an “internet-famous Party secretary.”
In 2021, Zhou was transferred to Tianjin as a vice mayor and later promoted to the municipal Party Standing Committee, overseeing propaganda and then organization work.
In March 2025, he came under investigation for “serious violations of discipline and law,” becoming the first senior Tianjin official targeted after that year’s National People’s Congress session. He was later identified as the first “tiger” level official in Tianjin to fall since the CCP’s 20th Party Congress, and the only provincial-level organization chief investigated during that period.
Official statements accused Zhou of lacking political conviction, improperly discussing central policies, and engaging in a wide range of corruption-related misconduct.
Corruption allegations and official findings
According to the official disciplinary findings, Zhou pursued distorted performance goals, launched excessive projects, and accepted banquets that could compromise his duties. He was also accused of improperly organizing personal celebrations.
The investigation further alleged that Zhou intervened in personnel appointments for personal gain, accepted gifts and cash, engaged in illicit relationships involving money and influence, interfered in disciplinary and judicial processes, and used public office to benefit business interests in exchange for large sums of money.
Despite his earlier public image as a pragmatic and approachable official, the findings portray him as a typical corrupt cadre whose conduct mirrored broader patterns within the system.
A contrast between rhetoric and reality
Zhou’s earlier speeches had emphasized restraint and practical governance. His so-called “ten more, ten less” framework encouraged officials to reduce empty rhetoric and focus on tangible results. He also promoted a leadership style that avoided treating governance as a stage for personal performance.
At the time, these remarks contributed to his reputation as a candid and relatable official. He once said he would give himself a score of 80 out of 100, noting that while he could not guarantee great achievements for future generations, he could at least avoid causing harm.
However, the contrast between his public statements and the corruption charges against him has drawn attention.
The case illustrates how officials who project a populist or grounded image may still engage in the same practices they publicly criticize. It also highlights the political risks associated not only with corruption, but with perceived deviations from official ideological lines.
By Li Deyan
Editor’s Note: