British psychic and prophet Craig Hamilton-Parker had previously sensed that Trump would have a third term and felt that a global-impacting conflict might occur, with Taiwan being one of the possible triggers. Now, even though many people think it’s impossible, the world has repeatedly produced major events or changes that were once unimaginable. Who could have predicted that Venezuela’s Maduro would be arrested overnight, or that British society would look completely different from just a few years ago? The pace of global change is relentless. Parker senses that the next U.S. election could bring change, potentially tied to a crisis affecting the world, leading to a dangerous situation in which Trump would need to remain in office. The existing order would have to be overturned, marking a period prone to major conflicts.
Many events in the world are interconnected and cannot be explained by a single factor. Eleven years ago, Parker predicted a scenario in which China and Russia would align to counter the U.S., foreseeing a conflict between China and the U.S., with even more conflicts expected in 2026. Regarding Greenland’s future, given that it already has military deployments capable of deterring any Russian attack, the issue is no longer purely military. Parker senses that part of it relates to real estate and the presence of extremely important rare earth resources in the surrounding area, which had already been mentioned in predictions two years prior. These resources will become a central theme in many future events. Parker now foresees an agreement forming, also tied to shipping—whoever controls the waterways will hold dominance, while the U.S. is trying to control the future flow of goods. Regarding Greenland, Parker’s intuition points to an agreement—a chaotic one involving NATO and China.
Too late: Britain is ‘handing it over’
In this prediction, Parker comments on Britain’s current politics, noting that China’s influence over the UK is not just expanding but has already become excessive—a view he strongly agrees with.
He points out that British politicians have repeatedly made the same mistake over the years: under the guise of economic cooperation, they gradually handed over key industries, technology, and strategic security. He describes these actions as “crazy” and “foolish,” with some politicians fabricating agreements to score short-term political points, sacrificing Britain’s long-term interests in the process.
The Chinese Communist Party does not need military force to occupy Europe; through economic penetration, technological dependence, and control of energy and information infrastructure, it can achieve the same effect. Parker warns that once foreign powers gain the ability to cut electricity, monitor communications, and track military movements, so-called “cooperation” has already become control. He believes British society is somewhat aware of this problem, but the political elite choose to ignore it—this is the fundamental reason Britain is losing its international influence.
Rewriting the world order
For the best of our weekly content！
You are now signed up for our newsletter
Check your email to complete sign up
Regarding NATO, Parker has warned before. He stated that years ago, he foresaw NATO moving toward an end and transformation. In his predictions, NATO’s problem is not military strength but “will.” During major conflicts, both NATO and the UN show the same traits: intervening too late, responding too weakly, and only discussing peacekeeping after wars end. Parker believes such organizations cannot handle 21st-century authoritarian regimes and systemic threats. The world is approaching a critical point, and without a truly capable “new international order” with force, authority, and execution, global disorder and war cycles will continue.
He repeatedly mentions 2030 as a key milestone. Before then, the old NATO and UN will exist only as temporary transitional structures, with more capable new entities emerging after major conflicts. This is not an optimistic prophecy but a reconstruction that comes at a cost.
Inside China and Taiwan
Parker’s description of China shows heightened caution. He mentions recent military purges and power reorganizations that resemble a “coup,” though the outside world has not yet seen the full picture. He repeatedly asks: Is Xi Jinping removing threats, or is he himself showing weakness and losing control? Parker notes that when power structures are unstable, newly appointed military figures often rush to leave a historical mark. In such circumstances, creating external enemies becomes the most direct way to divert internal pressure. Taiwan is the most dangerous outlet under this logic.